Is that better? I don't know. Like I said, they're much easier to read, written for a person rather than a machine, but again, like I said, they're stupider. It needs to be dumb, easy to understand, so people click and share without really thinking about it. It shows a certain level of smarts and interest if a person is already looking for something by using a search engine.
Thursday, February 6, 2014
No more SEO articles. It's all about Social.
No more SEO articles. It's all about Social. Is this a good thing? Maybe. Articles are definitely easier to read now that they're not written to appeal to a search algorithm, but they're also stupider, especially the headlines, to appeal to the lowest common denominator on Social Media.
Is that better? I don't know. Like I said, they're much easier to read, written for a person rather than a machine, but again, like I said, they're stupider. It needs to be dumb, easy to understand, so people click and share without really thinking about it. It shows a certain level of smarts and interest if a person is already looking for something by using a search engine.
Is that better? I don't know. Like I said, they're much easier to read, written for a person rather than a machine, but again, like I said, they're stupider. It needs to be dumb, easy to understand, so people click and share without really thinking about it. It shows a certain level of smarts and interest if a person is already looking for something by using a search engine.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment